Our mission is to provide grants, advocacy and education to
support impact litigation on behalf of marginalized communities
seeking economic, environmental and social justice.
FIGHT FOR LEGAL CHANGE TO BENEFIT EVERYONE
Let's make Justice available to everyone, not just the wealthy. Together we can end injustices like gender discrimination, LGBT discrimination, ableism, unfair worker compensation, racial discrimination, wage theft and environmental racism. Join this important movement today.
Who we are:
The Impact Fund is a passionate group of legal experts supporting cases that positively impact the day-to-day lives of marginalized communities.
What we do:
Provide $5.7 million in grants to advance public interest litigation that benefits large numbers of people, leads to significant law reform and raises public consciousness.
Train the next generation of social justice warriors.
Take corporate America to court, fighting for worker's rights, civil rights, and social justice. By winning these landmark cases we are able to establish a legal precedent for the future.
Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp. - Fighting for women's rights. After years of legal battles, the court certified the case as a nationwide class action, finding that Costco had shown significant company-wide discrimination of women.
Estrada v. Bashas’ Inc. - Fighting for equal pay for hispanic workers. After over a decade of litigation, the district court granted our motion for class certification, permitting over 12,000 Bashas' workers to challenge pay inequity.
WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT TO WIN MORE CASES LIKE THESE. DONATE NOW AND HELP US TO MAKE THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORK FOR THE 99%
Connect with us:
Latest Social Justice News & Stories
Earlier this year, the North Carolina legislature passed a sweeping anti-LGBT bill, H.B. 2, which requires public schools and agencies to discriminate against transgender people by prohibiting them from using sex-segregated restrooms according to their gender identity. Plaintiffs Joaquín Carcaño, the ACLU of North Carolina, and others filed a lawsuitchallenging H.B. 2 as unlawful discrimination against transgender individuals under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
The recent appellate decision affirming class certification, Ruiz Torres v. Mercer Canyons Inc., No. 15-35615 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2016), written by Judge Milan Smith, skillfully addresses the issues of informational injury, non-injured class members, class definition, and aggregate damages while scrupulously declining defendant's invitation to engage the underlying merits.
The Supreme Court docket this past term had class action practitioners holding their breath. Over the last five years, the Court has limited access to class actions in cases including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, and American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant. This term, the Court took on an unprecedented four class action cases. The outcome is fascinating and has many ramifications for the ability of class actions to serve as a vehicle for groups of people—including workers, minorities, and consumers—to hold corporations and the government accountable.